Skip to main content

He Quit His Job to Protest the Media Bending to Trump. Here’s What He Thinks the Press Needs to Do Now.

 

A large Donald Trump looming over the Los Angeles Times building.
Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Magali Cohen/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images and Kirby Lee/

As of next month, we’re going to have a president in the White House who has been uniquely hostile to the press. Donald Trump has threatened to take cable networks who are too critical of him off the air, and to jail reporters who don’t give up their sources.

In the weeks before the presidential election, the billionaire owners of two of the nation’s biggest newspapers—seemingly anticipating a Trump win and wanting to get in his good graces—made some troubling moves. Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos demanded that the paper, for the first time in decades, not endorse anyone for president. It will also cease offering endorsements in future presidential races. And the owner of the Los Angeles Times, Patrick Soon-Shiong, killed an already-drafted endorsement of Kamala Harris at the last minute.

Soon-Shiong and Bezos both defended their decisions by arguing that this will allow readers to make up their own minds about candidates while also helping their papers mitigate a perception of bias. However, Bezos has a clear conflict of interest. His space company Blue Origin has been competing for government contracts, and Bezos himself spoke with Trump days before his paper announced it would no longer be issuing presidential endorsements. Meanwhile, Soon-Shiong has been making controversial changes at the Times since the election. He said he plans to introduce a “bias meter,” powered by A.I., to accompany stories in the news and opinion sections, and he hired conservative commentator Scott Jennings to sit on the paper’s editorial board.

In response, tens of thousands of readers of both papers ended up canceling their subscriptions. Several frustrated journalists have been resigning.

Harry Litman is an opinion columnist who worked at the L.A. Times for over 15 years and was also a contributing columnist at the Post from 2018–20. He’s one of many journalists who have quit recently over the newsroom’s decision to no longer publish presidential endorsements. After explaining his resignation on his Talking Feds Substack, Litman spoke with Slate about his decision and how he sees the future of journalism under a second Trump administration.

Here’s our conversation, which has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Shirin Ali: At what moment did you decide you wanted to leave the L.A. Times?

Harry Litman: Like a lot of people, including people who read either the Washington Post or the L.A. Times, I was struck and unnerved by the decision to pull the plug on the endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris and to do it in a pretty brutal way. The paper’s editorial page has been giving all kinds of arguments and covering different angles of the political landscape for a couple years, and they led pretty naturally to an endorsement of Harris. But to just decapitate an already drafted endorsement for one candidate struck me as pretty unusual and alarming, especially when it was done around the same time as it happened with the Washington Post, so two of the most prominent papers in the country had done it. This didn’t seem to be motivated by particular policy positions or thinking that the editorial boards had been biased or negligent in some way. It was the fact that we got a president-elect who was threatening the media—threatening pretty much all the guardrails of democracy, the media being a really important one.

So it struck me that the media, at least those papers, blinked at a really important time. From there, there were additional moves by the L.A. Times’ ownership, and it was obvious that the owner wanted to move the editorial direction of the paper, which he characterized expressly on Fox News as “fair and balanced.” It seemed to me that the notion was to curry favor with Trump—I thought the paper’s movements toward Trump weren’t about being more accurate, but rather being more pleasing to the would-be autocrat, and that struck me as really pretty bad, especially in tandem with the other things that Trump is doing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Syrian security forces accused of executing dozens of Alawites

  Syrian security forces are alleged to have executed 52 people belonging to the Alawite minority in the coastal province of Latakia, according to one war monitoring group. Footage seen by the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights shows dozens of bodies in civilian clothing piled up in the garden of a house in Latakia. An interior ministry source told the country's official news agency Sana said that "individual violations" had occurred on the coast and pledged to put a stop to them. BBC News has not been able to verify claims that the killings were committed by the forces of Syria's new rulers. This followed clashes   between government forces and fighters loyal to the deposed President Bashar al-Assad , which left more than 70 dead. A curfew has been imposed in the cities of Homs, Latakia and Tartous, where the fighting has broken out. Earlier, BBC Verify confirmed two videos that showed a body being dragged behind a car in Latakia. The United Nation...

Save me from the burden that isn’t mine” – Jumoke Odetola cries out to God

  Actress and producer Jumoke Odetola has lamented over the current state of social media, criticizing the prevalence of “clout chasing” and a lack of emotional intelligence, self-awareness, and common sense among users. In an Instagram post, Odetola described how interacting with people who lack these qualities can be mentally draining.  She also expressed her exhaustion with feeling secondhand embarrassment from individuals she neither knows nor engages with. Turning to faith, she prayed for strength to ignore negativity, remain unbothered, and avoid wasting time on issues that do not concern her. She wrote: “In this age and time where clout chasing is the new currency and lots of people do not even know where and when to draw the line. “If you still have common sense, emotional intelligence, social awareness, and self-awareness. I bet you don’t realize how blessed you are. The irony is it’s a blessing wrapped in thorns, those who lack these basic qualities can be incredibly...

PDP crisis: Members suggest solutions, recommend sanctions

  Members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), under the aegis of the Conference of Professionals in the Peoples Democratic Party (CP-PDP), have said only appropriate sanctions for erring members can restore the party’s credibility. The group noted that the fact that certain individuals have been allowed to consistently bring the party into disrepute and act as if they are above the law gives the impression that the party has lost direction. They suggested that erring party members be sanctioned to send the right signals to potential troublemakers as the only way forward. Protem National Coordinator of the CP-PDP, Barr, Obinna Nwachukwu, said this in Abuja on Thursday. He said, “The Conference urges the party’s National Disciplinary Committee to accelerate its proceedings on all petitions pending before it for necessary action.” The CP-PDP leader observed that the party leadership’s delay in invoking the statutory provisions of the PDP Constitution was largely to blame for the li...